Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Trumpagonia


I am stationed only feet away from a sophomore fraternity bro, adorned in all brand names; Patagonia, Adidas, and Nike, filling up a metallic water bottle ornamented in his frat’s greek symbols and a MAGA sticker. I wonder if he knows that every brand he’s wearing right now has publicly denounced Trump. And then I wonder if he even cares.

·      Patagonia founder: 'Trump is the perfect person to take us to the apocalypse'
·      Adidas "…took a stance against Trump…releasing a company-wide email to all employees in which they denounced his actions."
·       Nike President and CEO: "Nike believes in a world where everyone celebrates the power of diversity…Those values are being threatened by recent executive order in the U.S. banning refugees…”


The interesting thing about Donald Trump is that he transcends conventional politics. Lacking political experience, party loyalty, and having little more to show than a background in business is only the beginning of Trumps 'unusual' candidacy. Party kingpins have criticized him, international leaders have condemned him, and celebrities rebuke him. Nonetheless, he soared in the primaries, he won the republican nomination, and he won the presidency.  Despite all of the criticisms and condemnations, the electorate, the Republican Party and the Electoral College still elected Donald Trump. I guess frat bros really don’t care if their MAGA sticker contradicts their fratagonia sweater.

An August 2016 Pew Research study states “Just 27% of registered voters say Trump would be a great or good president; 15% say he would be average, while 12% say he would be poor and 43% say he would be terrible.” And according to RealClearPolitics as of Jan. 29th, 2017, Trump’s approval rating is at 44%.
For comparison, “Barack Obama’s first disapproval rating was only 12 percent. Even George W. Bush, who was elected after a protracted and controversial recount, opened with only 25 percent disapproval. Bill Clinton won just 43 percent of the vote in 1992, but only 20 percent disapproved of his job performance at the outset of his presidency in 1993.” (politico)

This poses a lofty threat for our President. As seen by Press Secretary Spicer’s freak out over crowd sizes at the inauguration (here), and Trump’s denial of approval rating data here,












...it is clear the Trump administration is very concerned with public opinion.

        While the administration seems to care a lot about being viewed in a positive light, they choose to DENY, DENY, DENY, negative attitudes instead of changing their approach. This proves problematic for those public dissenters, as this Vox article points out; approval ratings are one of the only avenues by which the public can restrain a president’s actions.
         Of course, the perception of Trump goes far beyond quantitative means, and is perhaps more striking when demonstrated anecdotally. Trump is widely condemned for comments he has made about women, ethnic minorities, the disabled, and other marginalized groups. Members of the public as well as government circles have given him titles such as “racist, sexist, and xenophobic”. While all of these criticisms should be staggering for anyone in public office, it does not seem like the administration has made pushes to deny accusations of bigotry, but rather, change the narrative to one that labels accusers as delicate and easily-offended.
Though I hardly see a future where this is the case, if Trump and his staff decided they want to improve the administration's image, they must start listening to their constituents. No more flipping the narrative, or minimizing claims of bigotry. When the numbers tell you that under half the public supports or approves of you within the day you assume office, as Winston Churchill once said, "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results." 

I really like to avoid using absolutist phrases such as “never”, “always”, “none”, or “all”, but this election, and this campaign have left me with little other vocabulary to describe the events of the last several months. So many things about the 2016 presidential were unprecedented in our history, Donald Trump himself being one of those things.   
Never before has a president of the United States starred in a reality television show.
Before Trump, it was always customary for U.S. presidents to play by the conventional rules of political correctness.
All previous presidents have had some amount of political experience before entering Executive Office.
None of the previous U.S. presidents in the past 40 years have had as low approval ratings as Trump upon entering office, and that’s considering that these are comparatively less contentious times.

He is unlike anything we’ve ever seen before, and I guess that’s what people like about him.

13 comments:

  1. Gen, this was a really well written and thought out article to read, not to mention entertaining! Your use of facts and statistics throughout the article really made your case. However, I noticed that you said "44% approval rating" for Donald Trump. Did you mean "disapproval" and it was just a typo? Well done!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, according to my source, it was 44% approval, which I decided to put instead of the disapproval rating, because I thought a figure below 50 would appear more striking :)

      Delete
  2. I think you made some really good points with a strong factual backing, however, I think you ignored some key features. Firstly, wouldn't it make sense that those clothing companies disapprove of Trump not for moral reasons, but economic reasons of forcing them to produce goods at a higher cost. Secondly, not all but part of the very low approval rating could be that we are currently the most partisan we have ever been and roughly 25% of the public is Republican. Finally, you pointed out all of the things that Trump has done different, but isn't that what makes him appealing to his constituency? Just from the idea that they already know what they are gonna get with a traditional politician, so why not try something new and see what happens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll address these remarks point by point.

      First - Of COURSE the clothing bit was more poking fun than serious accusation of contradictory endorsements. However, Patagonia, a brand you are surely fond of, has definitely opposed him based on his political and moral practices. Try this link: (https://www.aol.com/article/finance/2017/01/27/patagonia-rages-against-trumps-environmental-policy-on-twitter/21701889/) Oh, and the other brands I mentioned were both speaking out about the '#muslimban', which I would argue is far less an economic issue than it is moral.

      Next, I think it's pretty dicey to say that we're more partisan than ever; maybe in recent memory, but not in the history of U.S. government. Even so, I think it would be naive ignore the consideration that a large reason we're so divided is due to the very rhetoric of Trump’s campaign. Should I link a list of sexist/racist/xenophobic comments he has made, or can we assume it’s common knowledge by now?

      Finally, yes, of course that's what makes him appealing, and I hope I’ve stressed that enough in this post. He's different, but not all change is good change. I'd prefer any establishment candidate that ran to Trump's brand of disestablishment any day of the week, and that includes Fridays. Thanks for the comment, Dan.

      Delete
  3. Gen, I can tell this topic is something you have taken a lot of time to ponder. I appreciate your use of sources. I can tell you do not enjoy trump but do you think that there is a possibility for a polling error in the stated statistics? I took a stats class last semester and we often talked about how easy it is to have skewed answers in voting poll due to only a certain demographic having access to take the poll. Secondly, as strong willed as you sound about this topic I was wondering If you think your opinion could ever be changed about Trump? If he took action to fix his self image as you suggested do you think that would be enough for you to change your opinion on him? I enjoyed reading your blog post! You seem to be a great writer, I look forward to reading your post for the rest of the semester.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would totally buy that the statistics in the poll I cited, *could* be incorrect. But I can link a few more, (https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2415), (http://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2017/02/in_latest_gallup_poll_presiden.html).
      Even under the assumption that all of these major research companies are getting inaccurate results, this does not quell or answer to the absolute fury I am seeing all around me. I could write a thesis on why this election has upset people in a way I’ve never seen politics effect people in my lifetime. And no, I will never support Trump. He can do whatever he wishes with his image but that does not change his history of shady business, sexual misconduct, and despicable remarks to minority groups. After all, the best predictor of the future is the past. If for whatever reason, Trump does a 180°, triple backflips, and lands in the splits, holding a sign that reads “I support women’s and minority’s rights” and begins to reflect that in his policies, sure, I would label Trump a good president, but I will never like him, and I will never respect him. Thanks for the thoughtful comment!

      Delete
  4. First of all, let me say that your blog was a really good read. I appreciate the time and effort you took in writing it. Trump really took this country and politics by surprise. Despite the clear, VERY CLEAR, reasons not to allow him to run our country (sexist, racist and xenophobic comments) he still found a way to gain enough votes to make it happen. Which still blows my mind. I do not support trump however i do think that his election is going to bring a lot of social movements into action and shine a light on what Americans really want to change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad to see you agree, thank you very much :)

      Delete
  5. Very entertaining blog. I really enjoyed the way you chose to open. You pointed out how many companies have denounced Trump, while always describing a typical Trump supporter. It certainly showed a strange disconnect between voters and the companies they choose to support. Along with that, the use of absolute words put many things into perspective. It definitely brought up concerning facts about this election and illustrates just how unique this presidential election was.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This blog was very well written. The perspective you choose to take on this blog was interesting and insightful. The formatting of your blog was also done nicely. You made strong points as to why Trump is not qualified to be our President in several categories. I feel as though the world has yet to see anything like Trump and that gives some people hope while many others fear.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This blog was very well written. The perspective you choose to take on this blog was interesting and insightful. The formatting of your blog was also done nicely. You made strong points as to why Trump is not qualified to be our President in several categories. I feel as though the world has yet to see anything like Trump and that gives some people hope while many others fear.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I really enjoyed reading this blog post. I like that you mixed entertainment with factual evidence. In today's society this is something that has seemed to work well. This strategy really draws in younger readers. I am excited to read more of your blogs in the future.

    ReplyDelete